January 1, 2015 Rules Update

New Court Rule Sets Available:

 

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

United States District Court, District of Maryland – Local Patent Rules

United States District Court, District of Massachusetts – Local Patent Rules

United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio – Local Patent Rules

United States District Court, District of Utah – Local Patent Rules

California Superior Court, Yuba County – Probate Division

Detailed information regarding updated rules can be found on the Rule Update Details page.

Embrace the Change

I have many years of experience working in the legal industry, a little over 30.  In all those years I have been very fortunate to survive drastic changes to the legal business environment.  From law firm mergers and layoffs to major changes in leadership and structure, one consistent theme that has helped me survive and prosper is embracing change.  I have seen many good people come and go over the years because they resisted the change in their firm’s new policies, leadership, workflow, software, and business models.  Those people included attorneys, administrators, and long time friends and colleagues.

resistanceIt did help that I have an entrepreneurial spirit.  Not only did I embrace the change but I also found ways to make it benefit my career.  I did not become complacent and wait for my fate, but rather took advantage of the situations and contributed to the change.  Sometimes it was a way for me to help the firm reduce costs, create greater efficiencies, or further mitigate their operational risks.

The end result is that I always found a way to make it work for me.  I took advantage of my professional advantages, including my network.  I know that sounds selfish but my progress always benefited people around me, including my team and even my friends and peers.   It advanced their careers, income, and job security as well.

So why do people resist change in the workplace?  Quite simply it is a normal human reaction when an individual or group perceives that the changes will be a threat to them.  The resistance can be covert or overt and damaging to not only the firm’s progress but also to the career of the persons resisting the change.

There are many reasons why people resist change.  To name just a few, the following list reflects the most common reasons.

  • Misunderstanding about the need for change — If staff do not understand the need for change you can expect resistance, especially from those who strongly believe the current way of doing things works well…and has done so for the last ten years.
  • Fear of the unknown — This is probably the most common reason for resistance. People will only embrace the change if they genuinely believe and feel that the risks of standing still are greater than those of moving forward in a new direction.
  • Lack of competence — People will seldom admit that they do not feel they will be able to make the transition to the change if it necessitates a change in skills.  They have little confidence in themselves so they resist.
  • Low trust — When people don’t believe that they, or the company, can competently manage the change there is likely to be resistance.

 

Besides the aforementioned, firms can actually contribute to the resistance with poor communication, forced changes, and bureaucratic inertia.  Nonetheless, change is inevitable and resistance is counterproductive and problematic.

There is a need for firms to change now more than ever because of fierce competition not only with other firms but also with existing clients.  Clients are keeping more work in-house in order to reduce overall legal spend.  Innovative technology and solutions, cost reductions,  lateral partner movement, and the economy are other motivators that make firms want and need to change.  For some firms, change is a survival tactic.

Managing resistance in a firm is very difficult.  The resistance can cause project delays, lost revenue, low morale, and a slew of other problems for the firm leaders.  Many firms do a wonderful job with communicating and motivating employees to accept the changes and turn their resistance into cooperation.  Sometimes, and especially during planned staff redundancies, getting rid of the resistance is much easier than trying to cope with it.

So what should you take away from reading this blog?  Well, in one sentence – Instead of resisting change, embrace it and make it work for you!

Chris Gierymski is the Director of Business Development at American LegalNet and can be reached at cgierymski@alncorp.com.

 

The Risks in Using Outdated Forms

Ifiling cabinetn the not so distance past, I was responsible for the maintenance of all the official court and agency forms used by the law firm in my previous career.  We stored hundreds of paper forms from the local courts and agencies most widely practiced in by the attorneys.  Any kind of form you can think of was included in those drawers, even forms that were copied from ineligible copies and ended up crooked.  Everyone relied on those forms to be accurate and up-to-date.  We had the latest and greatest typewriters to accommodate typing on those forms.

I used to send a clerk to the courthouse on a monthly basis to get samples of every form that existed.  That clerk would then compare every paper form in our drawers with those obtained from the court for the revised date.  That method took days and weeks to accomplish because we were always busy and interrupted with questions from the internal clients we supported.  Needless to say, by the time we completed comparing the forms, it was time to go back to court and get more samples.

Then one day I was told that the floor I resided on would be renovated and updated to a more modern look and feel.  I was also told that my department space would need to be decreased due to the new design and to accommodate more attorney offices.  I immediately embraced the thought of getting rid of all those forms and storing them electronically instead.  Oh, the resistance I received with that idea.  How could I take away their need for typewriters and rely on electronic forms monitored by a vendor?  I know those electronic forms will not be as accurate as the paper ones from the court.  I spent weeks convincing the resistors and office leaders that the electronic forms were more accurate and monitored daily for revisions instead of monthly (snicker) like we used to do.  Finally, everyone gave in and we adopted electronically stored forms and got rid of three large cabinets filled with outdated and useless forms.  That was one of the best decisions I ever made as a manager and it only took about three to six months for the complaining and threats to stop.  Not only did I reduce the firm’s operational costs and risks, but I also increased workflow efficiencies dramatically.

The days of sending someone to court to get updated forms are over.  Most courts and agencies store their forms digitally on their web sites. Many even provide them in a fillable format to use and reuse.  If you are still storing court and agency forms in paper format please know that you are likely creating a risk to the firm and a disservice to the attorneys.  On any given day, one of those forms could have been revised without your knowledge, especially by statute, and its use could render your firm’s services ineffective and cause prejudice and harm to your client.  For example, when filing and perfecting a mechanic’s lien in the recorder of deeds in the county where the property is located, if the claimant uses a form lacking the required wording for the notice in compliance with the statutory requirements, the penalties can be severe.

What about the forms available on the court and agency web sites?  Surely those forms must be accurate and timely updated.  They are, in fact, “official” forms provided to the public by governmental employees.  NOT SO.  Take a look at the courts’ web sites and review any disclaimers related to their forms.  You may be surprised to see the wording of their statements.  Plus, I have on three separate occasions heard stories of legal professionals that used the wrong or outdated form downloaded from the court’s web site and faced repercussions for assuming the form was current.

Here are just several disclaimers I found searching the Internet:

  • “Due to the changing nature of the law, the forms and information contained on this web site may become outdated. Therefore, you should review and research statutes and rules of procedure referenced in the instructions to ensure that they are accurate and current.”
  • “In no event will the State Court Administrator’s Office or anyone contributing to the production of these forms and instructions be liable for any indirect or consequential damages resulting from their use.”
  • “These forms may or may not be appropriate in your particular case. Any desired outcome from your use of the forms cannot be predicted or guaranteed.”
  • “Forms available on this website should not be considered legal advice, and are provided only for reference purposes. These forms are provided only as a guide in developing a form for a particular case and set of facts. The content and format of forms not specifically determined by statute or court rule may require modifications to suit the specifics of a given case.”

 

So as you can see, even the courts want you to know that their forms are not always updated as regularly as they would like to be.  Even more so now with court budgets hurting so desperately and drastically reduced staff.  The forms get updated when they can.

Maintaining forms is a laborious and costly effort.  That’s why there are only a few vendors in the country that provide official forms that truly benefit and protect the law firms and users.  Furthermore, there are even fewer vendors that offer integrations and plugins that automate the process of filling out forms.

The following scenarios are further proof that using an automated forms solution that integrates with a firm’s document management system greatly benefits the firms and its clients.  The risks to the firm of using an outdated form outweigh the price of the forms product.

  • Having to retype an entire form just to revise some language or make room for a lengthy caption. That took over an hour when it could have been performed in less than 3 minutes.
  • Reusing the same fillable form obtained from the court web site for over a year because it was easier to do that than check the web site each time and start all over.  Unknowingly, that form was recently updated and published by the court and you filed an outdated one.  You did not realize that until the attorney came back from a hearing and shared his concerns over your abilities as the hearing was stricken due to using the wrong form.
  • You need to send out by mail a real estate transfer declaration form and realize the only way to get that form is by sending a runner to the local agency.  It is 4:30 local time and the agency is now closed.  The agency does not store that form on their web site.  You scramble calling friends from other firms trying to get them to email it to you.  No one is available to assist you.
  • You need a form that you never heard of before and realize it is not in paper format anywhere in the firm’s file cabinets or stored electronically in the document management system.  You search the Internet and find that exact form available for purchase for $29.99 in fillable Word format.  You end up purchasing it using your own personal credit card. Bummer.

 

FWF toolbarUsing a reputable vendor that provides not only court forms but also agency, corporate, real estate, UCC, and many other types of forms, is the only way to reduce risks and create greater efficiencies.  Having a toolbar plugin in Microsoft Word with auto-fillable capabilities by storing profiles that can be reused with information for the attorney, firm, case, parties, court, etc. further reduces data input errors.  Being able to save those forms automatically to your document management system just tops the cake and makes it more valuable.

American LegalNet has proudly offered Forms Workflow (FWF) to over 50% of the AmLaw 100 firms since 1996.  To this day, we continue to improve the workflow that firms require to “do more with less.”   FWF provides easy access to over 80,000 official forms by using a dedicated web site or a toolbar plugin in MS Word.  Not only can you save commonly used information in the profiles, but you can also unlock the forms to modify them as needed, even change their font.  Plus, we can even convert and publish your internal forms for easy navigation and use.  Don’t wait until you file an outdated form and jeopardize your career, visit our web site and get started now.  For more information, please contact me at cgierymski@alncorp.com.

Multi-Year Docketing Software Contracts: Who Really Benefits?

sign contractFor many years, software companies have traditionally offered their clients multi-year contracts.  It is no different for docketing software providers.  There are many advantages to signing a contract that locks you in for several years.  However, there are also disadvantages and red flags that you need to know before signing.

So let’s take a look at the advantages, disadvantages, and red flags:

Advantages

  • Multi-year contracts generally do reduce costs over the life of the new contract.  Firms can save money.
  • Budgets are easier to predict every year.  When budgeting time comes around, managers can easily account for the next fiscal year.
  • Saves on administrative time having to evaluate their current software or vendors every year.  Many firms have reduced staff now and do more with less.  That means less time.
  • Locking into a multi-year contract that actually saves the firm lots of money will definitely enhance the manager’s career and possibly salary and bonus.
  • Strengthens the existing relationship between the firm and the vendor.  Such a long term commitment should provide the opportunity to bolster the professional connection between the vendor and the firm.

 

Disadvantages

  • A multi-year contract may actually end up costing you more than you thought.  Make sure you closely review all the terms related to the initial costs and annual percentage increases of the software and maintenance subscription fees.  Do the math carefully and twice.  You might end up being surprised that you really did not save much at all.
  • No flexibility in response to the changing conditions in the legal market, which could mean greater liability and risk to the firm.  Firms merge, bring on large lateral groups with special needs, and lose revenue to departing partners.  Responding to such conditions if needed with your docketing software will be extremely limited.
  • Competition may decrease and result in less innovation.  Firms are always looking for products with more features and capabilities, products that cost less but can do more, and products that just plain solve their needs better than any other product can. When vendors compete, firms get what they want.
  • Prevents firms from taking advantage of new technologies, integrations, or service models going forward.
  • Being locked into a contract for several years is not always desirable, particularly where the alternative is to incur cancellation charges that could offset the initial savings.

 

Red Flagswonder

  • If your docketing software vendor begins offering you a multi-year contract, drastically reducing their annual subscription and maintenance fees, and offering unlimited access to some of their services, think twice about their generosity.  Most likely this is a vendor that is responding to new competition, has not listened to their clients for many years, and is threatened because of their lack of innovation and product development.
  • Your existing vendor suddenly begins to speak poorly of the competition and the new products in the market.
  • After months of no contact, your existing vendor begins reaching out to you regularly to discuss your well-being and then you realize it is time to renew the contract.

 

The dynamics of the legal market are drastically changing.  We are in a new age of docketing software and vendors, with so many innovative ideas and challenges facing every law firm, docketing professional, and software vendor.  You are no longer limited to the same vendor and product you have used for the last 10 plus years because there were no other players around.  The age of monopolized products and services are gone and that is due to the basic concept of competition.  One of the main reasons why there are new players and product offerings is due to years of client complaints about the firm’s existing docketing vendors.

Multi-year contracts can be very lucrative for both the firm and the vendor.  The vendor especially benefits by eliminating the competition.  It has always been my belief that the firm should ask for the multi-year contract and not the vendor pushing it on the firm.  Before you sign a multi-year contract, evaluate your firm’s needs and make sure you are willing to commit.  Be very curious why the vendor is now offering multi-year contracts when they may not have for many years.

At American LegalNet, we partner with our clients and understand their needs and issues.  We do not push multi-year contracts and would rather work closely to solve any issues and create enhancements to further our relationship and stake in the firm.  We want to work hard in order to continue to win your business.  We do what you want and need and respond accordingly, even if it is you asking for a multi-year contract.

Chris Gierymski is the Director of Business Development at American LegalNet and can be reached at cgierymski@alncorp.com.

Business Intelligence: How Can a Docketing Professional Contribute?

Business IntelligenceOne of the reasons the National Docketing Association was formed was to increase the visibility of the profession of docketing. In a nutshell, that means firms should acknowledge that this group of people is as significant to the firm’s bottom line as are the attorneys, paralegals, and secretaries. In addition to being critical to risk management practices, the support that docketing professionals provide is directly related to the firm’s billable matters which translates into increased billable time. With effective docketing support, attorneys can bill more time and concentrate on the substantive legal issues rather than the routine tasks.

Besides being experts with court rules interpretations, procedural guidelines, and case management, docketing professionals can use their role to drive other firm objectives. Contributing to the firm’s business intelligence and knowledge management is an important and often underestimated benefit of a robust docketing solution. Many firms overlook the docketing system and how much information can be used to help with business development, intelligence, and knowledge in order to be more competitive and increase operational efficiencies.

All kinds of information can be extracted from the records by properly mining the data in a robust and effective docketing solution. Here are some scenarios where a docketing professional can contribute to the firm’s business intelligence and knowledge management efforts.

Scenario #1

An attorney needs to file a motion to be admitted temporarily (pro hac vice) in a court where he is not a member and allowed to practice. The court rules require that the movant provide the names of the firm’s attorneys that were previously admitted to that court as well as the cases handled.

  • Problem – the moving attorney sends a broadcast email to all attorneys in the firm asking if they were ever admitted to that court. With attorneys receiving so many emails daily this email gets mostly ignored and the moving attorney does not get enough of the information required.
  • Solution – The docketing specialist filters the records in the database searching for cases assigned to that jurisdiction and sends a list to the requesting attorney containing all the names of the attorneys and cases filed in that jurisdiction. Even better, the docketing solution allows the specialist to easily search all the documents attached to the deadlines for the key words “pro hac vice”. Now the requesting attorney only has to contact a few attorneys if necessary and receives a sample motion.

 

 Scenario #2

The firm is drafting an RFP (request for proposal) and competing to get the litigation business of a major company. The proposal requires information specific to the firm’s trial practice with certain kinds of cases such as product liability.

  • Problem – The marketing team scrambles to get that information by contacting logical departments such as the library, conflicts, accounting, and new business intake. None of them are able to provide all the information needed. The marketing team sends out a mass email to all litigation attorneys in the firm. That information provided is not enough to satisfy the RFP.
  • Solution – The specialist searches the docketing records for trials in cases where the nature of suit is product liability. The list is sent to the marketing team and they contact those attorneys for more contributing information.

 

 Scenario #3

An attorney was served with discovery that reveals the opposing party’s expert witness. The attorney needs to know if this witness ever provided testimony in any other cases the firm handled.

  • Problem – The attorney asks the library to search any external resources where this expert provided testimony in any court. He gets the report back with nothing relevant but the expert’s curriculum vitae reveals information supporting otherwise. The attorney resorts to mass emails and gets no response.
  • Solution – The specialist searches the database for the expert’s name and provides the attorney with the relevant case information.

 

Not all docketing solutions are created equal. As a matter of fact, most docketing software that firms use do not have an easy way for the docketing professional to search the data and run reports effectively mining the database. This causes a dilemma in that firms do not rely on their docketing solution to provide business intelligence or knowledge management. The more contributions a docketing professional can make to the firm’s objectives, the more visibility the profession of docketing gets in all firms.

Keyword SearchAt American LegalNet, our innovative solutions not only help firms mitigate their risks with deadline errors and omissions, but they also take into account the importance of workflow and the value the docketing professional has to the firm. eDockets ™ Critical Dates has a feature called Keyword Search that enables the docketing professional to easily search all trigger dates, deadlines, and the contents of every document stored in the system, right from the home screen. Not only can you search the title or description of the documents, but you can also search the body as well for any key word. So every supporting document attached to the deadlines is searchable.

If you would like more information or to view a demo, please contact cgierymski@alncorp.com or 219-237-2672.

December 1, 2014 Rules Update

New Court Rule Sets Available:

United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Mississippi

United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Mississippi

United States Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania

California Claims and Actions Against Public Entities/Employees

Massachusetts Housing Court

New York Supreme Court, New York County, Hon. Nancy M. Bannon

Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure

Washington Rules of Appellate Procedure

Washington Superior Court, Skagit County

 

Detailed information regarding updated rules can be found on the Rule Update Details page.

From Docketing to Sales Professional: Why I Made the Move

For almost 30 years, I worked for law firms supporting attorneys with everything from delivering courtesy copies to judges’ chambers as a mailroom clerk to providing procedural and rules based advice as a quasi-attorney.  I ended my

Chris Gierymski
Chris Gierymski, Director of Business Development at American LegalNet Inc

docketing career at the top, as the national director of docketing at the world’s largest law firm and president of the only national association catering specifically to docketing professionals.

People frequently ask me why I changed careers when I had it all – job security, industry respect, passion for success, and an entrepreneurial spirit.  Well, in order to answer that we should look at all the main reasons why people do change careers.

  1. Your Life Has Changed
    Some people change careers because they go from being single to married with children.  Although my life did not change drastically as with marital status, it did change with familial status.  My children grew up.  Having a “family friendly” job was not as critical anymore as it once was with raising five wonderful children.
  2. The Job Outlook in Your Field Worsened
    For many legal careers, the Great Recession took its toll.  People lost jobs due to staff redundancies caused by forced cost reductions in order to increase profits.  This was not the case for me or most docketing professionals.  Yes, the recession caused layoffs in law firms for some docketing staff.  A majority of docketing professionals, however, survived at their firms because they were able to consistently prove that their support was directly related to the firm’s billable matters and risk management practices.
  3. You are Experiencing Job Burnout
    Ok.  This aspect of job satisfaction did affect me personally.  Have you ever watched the movie “Groundhog Day” with actor Bill Murray?  Every day he would wake up to the same routine over and over.  That was an important factor in my decision to switch careers.  It was not that I did not like working at my firm, or with the people I supported and my former colleagues.  It was that I succeeded in creating firm wide docketing support and my team functioned like a well-oiled machine.  I had the best professionals working for me and the firm with little to no problems to deal with on a daily basis.  That was actually to my detriment.  I did not have any challenges.
  4. Your Job is Too Stressful
    It is not easy supporting hundreds of attorneys and that alone can cause people to switch careers from the legal field.  Any of my former colleagues and peers in the docketing profession will attest to that.  I have seen many people come and go in the legal community.  But I did not feel stressed out and was rather complacent with my job.
  5. You Find Your Work Boring
    Many docketing professionals only have so far they can climb on the career advancement ladder.  I climbed up as far as I could go working for the law firm and volunteering for the association, and missed the challenges I once faced.
  6. You Want to Earn More Money
    Far too many people change careers just for the money.  Although your salary is extremely important, it should not be the main factor for leaving your current employment.  Job satisfaction is far more important to your health and well-being than just making a lot of money.  For me, the chance to control my salary by selling software I identify with was very lucrative.

I changed careers to sales because I have an entrepreneurial spirit and a passion for success.  It was just perfect timing and I took advantage of it.  According to Forbes Magazine, an entrepreneur has five essential qualities.  I can identify with every one of them.  Can you?

      1. Vision and dissatisfaction with the present.
      2. Knowing and taking advantage of your unfair advantages.
      3. The ability to get people on board and add to the vision.
      4. Flexibility to adapt, openness to feedback, and the ability to learn.
      5. Persistence and execution.

Sales is extremely exciting.  You get to meet so many people at different levels at law firms.  You also get to travel a lot.  Your schedule is very flexible and you control it.  Sales can equal nice profits.  As I mentioned earlier, the more you sell the more money you make.  It is not an easy task but it can be very rewarding.  Selling also provides you with a sense of accomplishment and challenge.  It is a wonderful feeling knowing you just helped a law firm reduce the risks inherent with deadline errors and omissions.

When I saw a demo of eDockets a couple of years ago, I was convinced that it was an innovative product and I wanted to be a part of its evolution.  I now get to use my background and experience to influence this product and share that with law firms.  The challenges I face every day keep me on my toes and young at heart.

ALN vs ALN

ALN eSMASHERS and ALN eSERVERS faced off in the long-anticipated league semi-final match, with the eSMASHERS coming out on top and maintaining their undefeated record for the season.  Despite the 4-1 result, there were a couple exciting matches, including the doubles match that went the distance, with Wallace and Ofri winning 11-9 in the fifth game.  Thanks to Xiomara for arranging refreshments and for all of the ALN supporters who showed up to cheer on (and occasionally jeer!) their fellow employees.  Both teams move on to the final round of playoffs during the second week of December, when the eSMASHERS will play for the league championship and the eSERVERS will play for 3rd place.  

      20141118_193300

 

November 1, 2014 Rules Update

New Court Rule Sets Available:

United States Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
United States District Court, Central District of California, Hon. Andre Birotte Jr.
California Superior Court, Placer County – Probate Division
California Superior Court, Solano County – Probate Division
California Public Utilities Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure
Illinois Circuit Court, 2nd Circuit
Indiana Circuit & Superior Court, Floyd County
North Carolina Superior Court, 4A Judicial District, Duplin County
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 5th Judicial District (Allegheny County)
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 19th Judicial District (York County)

Detailed information regarding updated rules can be found on the Rule Update Details page.

Aln Launches the “edockets for Good™” Program

American LegalNet is launching the first-annual eDockets for Good™, a program that supports and encourages the charitable efforts of the employees and law firms throughout the country.

“eDockets for Good started as an idea, a way to give back the community in appreciation for supporting our success and bring together the values ALN team members, partners and customers are doing in our local communities,” explained Erez Bustan, president and CEO, American LegalNet. “It is our goal to reach new heights in charitable giving, whether monetarily or through volunteer services to make a profound difference by helping those in need.”

Through the program, ALN and its customers aim to help communities and charities across the country through monetary donations or employee volunteer programs.

ALN invites law firms to join the eDocket for Good program and make a difference in our communities. Join today and start making an immediate impact. For more information on the program, please email charities@alncorp.com.

Bitnami