Duane Morris LLP

Duane Morris - Logo

Duane Morris Consolidated Firm-wide Docketing

Evolving from a partnership of prominent lawyers in Philadelphia a century ago, Duane Morris’ modern organization stretches from the U.S. to Europe and the Middle East, and now across Asia. Today, the firm has more than 800 attorneys.  Throughout this global expansion, Duane Morris has remained committed to preserving its collegial, collaborative culture that has attracted many talented attorneys.

The Goal

To become efficient and consistent, Duane Morris had to find a cutting-edge solution to consolidate separate docketing and calendaring systems into a single unified rules-based docketing platform, while eliminating the need to enter data manually across systems. 

American LegalNet was the only vendor that had a single product – eDockets – that included all the criteria our firm needed, providing universal access to court dates and court rules from all jurisdictions we currently had available, plus expanded our selection by an additional 200+ court rule sets.

Lisa Vessels, RP, CP, FRP, Firm Docket Manager

The Situation

With 1300 users across 22 offices, Duane Morris had enormous docketing volume to manage. The firm took a decentralized approach, asking attorneys, paralegals and legal assistants to handle their own docketing. These professionals relied on various software applications to complete their tasks effectively.

There were 3 different docketing software systems – one for New York, a second for Chicago, and third for all other offices. The New York and Chicago systems required subscriptions for access to court dates, and then manual data entry into the third system to sync dates with Outlook. Although the third system did integrate with Outlook, it was no longer competitive, state-of-the-art technology.

One critical objective was to convert all docketing data into SQL formatted language. Some applications had docket feeds, others did not. Some of the legacy data was in “static” form—unstructured, not in columns/rows. It was crucial to convert not only the raw data, but also associated items like reminder flags.

We find it to be intuitive and user-friendly. I used to spend six to eight hours with the previous software to complete rules updates, and now it only takes 15 minutes.

John Sroka, CIO at Duane Morris LLP

The Plan

American LegalNet launched an extensive 6-week pilot installation with 25 users across 7 different offices. Positive results and feedback led to a decision to greenlight the solution. A firm-wide implementation occurred in phases: New York data first, then Chicago, and the remaining 20 offices launched once users were trained. Each phase took 4-6 weeks. Adding to the complexity, the project had to be completed in a scheduled open window during a major phone installation project.

Duane Morris purchased all modules of eDockets for a complete enterprise implementation.

Product Features
eDockets Main module with 1,700+ rule sets
Auto Docket Automated federal court downloads from PACER & NYSCEF
Docket Direct Automated court docket feeds from New York and Chicago state, and federal court systems. Directly sync into Outlook through eDockets
iManage FileSite Integration of all attachments to calendar events

American LegalNet engineers quickly put my worries to rest. Even after the first data conversion in New York, I was amazed at how clean the data was, accurately capturing the minutiae of rules-based docketing, including capturing of all reminder flags.

Lisa Vessels, RP, CP, FRP, Firm Docket Manager

The Result

American LegalNet’s conversion of data from three legacy systems into the eDocket system was seamless. The data set was huge—over 1 million transactions. The nested event hierarchy within each docket set, tracked movements of dates, multiple reminders, team changes, etc. were all precisely captured by the analysts performing the conversion into eDockets. The conversion was so seamless that users could barely decipher the converted data from the native data.  All the data in the final conversion was completed with a week to spare.

The eDockets product suite from American LegalNet allowed the firm to consolidate multiple regional software products into one single national platform with regional support. With eDockets, Duane Morris can now communicate with one platform and use that platform across jurisdictions to manage information about court actions and deadlines.

The eDockets reporting functionality was new for the firm and provided users the ability to run their own reports or look at individual events for a specific attorney or whole group. Extensive automated reports are now delivered by email automatically on a set schedule and can be customized.

In addition, eDockets offered new features and attachments to events to make it easy for attorneys who are not using the software directly. eDockets has a hyperlink in the appointments section of Outlook that allows attorneys to see additional event details, such as how the rules calculations were determined. The software then calculates the deadlines for them.

American LegalNet is always ready to go above and beyond.  ALN was challenged by a firm partner who wanted a special feature within his reports that mimicked what he had been using in the old software. So, while the eDockets implementation was ongoing, ALN found a third-party software provider to develop a method to accommodate the request.

American LegalNet has continued to provide us with unique solutions that have had an outstanding impact on our firm’s day-to-day activities. The entire team has delivered on all their promises and exceeded our expectations. Today, all our eDockets users at Duane Morris could not be happier with the American LegalNet product.

John Sroka, CIO

Read More American LegalNet Success Stories

June 2018 Court Rules Update

New Court Rule Sets Available:

Florida Circuit Court, 11th Judicial District, Business Court, Hon. Beatrice Butchko ((FL11BB))

New York Supreme Court, New York County, Hon. Paul A. Goetz, IAS Part 47 ((NYNYPG))

New York Supreme Court, Onondaga County ((NYONSC))

USBC, Alaska ((AKBK))

USDC, Southern District of New York, Mag. Robert W. Lehrburger ((NYRWL))

 

 

Courts Removed:

USDC, Central District of California, Mag. Jay C. Gandhi ((JCG))

USDC, District of Delaware, Hon. Sue L. Robinson ((DESLR))

 

 

Detailed information regarding updated rules can be found on the Rule Update Details page.

May 2018 Court Rules Update

New Court Rule Sets Available:

California Family Code ((CAFAM))

California Superior Court, Los Angeles County, Family Law Division ((CAFCLA))

Idaho District Court ((IDRCPE))

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District ((MOCAWD))

North Carolina Superior Court, 19A Judicial District, Cabarrus County ((NC19A))

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 12th Judicial District, Dauphin County ((PA12))

 

 

Courts Removed:

USDC, Eastern District of New York, Hon. Leonard D. Wexler ((NYLDW))

USDC, Southern District of California, Mag. David H. Bartick ((CADHB))

USDC, Southern District of New York, Hon. Thomas P. Griesa ((NYTPG))

 

 

Detailed information regarding updated rules can be found on the Rule Update Details page.

Is Your Firm Secretly Wasting $100,000 or More Annually on PACER Download Fees?

If You Could Put $50K or Even $150K Back into Your Firm’s Bottom-Line, Every Year, Would You?

As we travel around the country we often ask top firms, ‘How much are your yearly federal PACER download fees?” Surprisingly, the answer often is, “That’s a good question, I don’t know.” Once they investigate these costs, most clients are surprised to learn how high they are.

The truth is large firms with a significant portion of their business in the federal space are often wasting six figures on PACER downloads – annually. Think about that for a moment – that is a hard cost that is impacting your firm’s bottom line, year after year.

Root of the Problem Stems from Attorney Behavior

The “why” can be answered simply: attorneys are trained to be efficient. As most people know, Federal courts keep their documents locked within a paywalled database – PACER. To access the court documents, you get a first look for free, but after that you must pay 10 cents per page. A fee that doesn’t seem like much on its face, until you examine attorney behavior.

What “could” happen to avoid the fees is for an admin to download a document once and store it in the firm’s document management system. When attorney’s need to access the document, they could be trained to go to the DMS to find the document. However, what we find in practice is that it is not efficient for attorneys to search the DMS. They live in Outlook, and instead they will go to their email, search for a document, and download it. After the first download, the charges start to incur. And over the lifetime of a case, it’s not uncommon for attorneys to go back to the same document/email and download it 4, 5, or even a dozen or more times. They are also likely to pass the email on to additional firm associates. These associates may or may not have been on the original court filing of the case. And how will those associates access the document? They will also click and download the document, possibly multiple times.

Over the course of time all these clicks and downloads that attorneys are doing on documents really add up. This is how firms incur costs of $50K and over $400k in extreme situations.

If there was a way you could recapture those wasted PACER download fees would you be interested? In addition to saving those hard costs, what if it was also possible to simultaneously make drastic improvements to docketing workflow and accuracy when processing PACER ECFs overall?

How do We Solve the Problem, but Still Allow Attorney’s to Have the Efficiency of Using Outlook to Quickly Access Documents?

Newer, more advanced docketing platforms process electronic court data feeds from most major state jurisdictions, and also process federal PACER ECF receipts automatically. They download PACER documents automatically without the need of a human to assist in the process. And these advanced docketing systems also push an email with a link to the document to the attorneys’ inboxes and calendars. Attorneys can download the document, repeatedly, without incurring any costs. This avoids the need to ask attorneys to change the work flow they have honed over years of practice.

If you would like to learn more, please reach out to us at info@alncorp.com.

April 2018 Court Rules Update

New Court Rule Sets Available:

N/A

 

 

Courts Removed:

United States District Court, Central District of California, Mag. Andrew J. Wistrich (CAAJW)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Hon. Samuel Der-Yeghiayan (ILSDY)

United States District Court, Southern District of New York, Mag. Andrew J. Peck (NYAJP)

 

 

Detailed information regarding updated rules can be found on the Rule Update Details page.

March 2018 Court Rules Update

New Court Rule Sets Available:

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 11th Judicial District, Luzerne County (PA11)

New York Supreme Court, New York County, Hon. Carmen Victoria St. George (NYNYCS)

United States Bankruptcy Court, New Hampshire (NHB)

 

Courts Removed:

New York Supreme Court, New York County, Hon. Ellen M. Coin (NYNYEC)

New York Supreme Court, New York County, Hon. Jeffrey K. Oing (NYJONC)

New York Supreme Court, New York County, Hon. Alice Schlesinger (NYNYAS)

New York Supreme Court, New York County, Hon. George J. Silver (NYNYGS)

United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, Hon. Sandra L. Townes (NYSLT)

 

Detailed information regarding updated rules can be found on the Rule Update Details page.

February 2018 Court Rules Update

New Court Rule Sets Available:

California Superior Court, Mendocino County, Probate Court (CAPRME)

California Superior Court, Sutter County, Probate Court (CAPRSU)

USDC, Northern District of California, Mag. Robert M. Illman (CARMI)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District (MOCASD)

 

Courts Removed:

New York Supreme Court, New York County, Hon. Richard F. Braun (NYNYRB)

New York Supreme Court, New York County, Hon. Paul Wooten (NYNYPW)

 

Detailed information regarding updated rules can be found on the Rule Update Details page.

January 2018 Court Rules Update – Supplement

New Court Rule Sets Available:

California Superior Court, Appellate Division, Marin County (CAAPMR)

 

Courts Removed:

New York Supreme Court, New York County, Hon. Geoffrey D. Wright (NYNYGW)

 

Detailed information regarding updated rules can be found on the Rule Update Details page.

December 2017 Court Rules Update

New Court Rule Sets Available:

U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission – Administrative Proceeding (SEC)

 

Courts Removed:

USDC, Southern District of New York, Mag. James C. Francis (NYJCF)

USDC, Northern District of California, Mag. Nandor J. Vadas (NJV)

 

Detailed information regarding updated rules can be found on the Rule Update Details page.

Bitnami