O’Melveny Lawyers Offer Guidance on Responding to Ransomware Attacks in Corporate Counsel Article

O’Melveny Lawyers Offer Guidance on Responding to Ransomware Attacks in Corporate Counsel Article

O’Melveny partner Kiran Raj and associate Mallory Jensen co-authored the article, “Ransomware: What to Do When it Happens to You,” published October 27, 2017, in Corporate Counsel.

“In an ideal world, your company has all its critical information and data comprehensively and securely backed up, employing strong defenses against hacking, phishing, and other cyberattacks,” the authors write. “In the event that your company is nonetheless the victim of a ransomware attack, this document provides steps to be taken as part of its response to such an incident.”

Implement previously created security incident response and business continuity plans. Cyber response and business continuity plans should contain the following steps to address a ransomware situation:

-Conduct initial analysis of the ransomware. After detecting the ransomware or receiving a ransom demand, it is important to determine, in a timely manner, the original affected device, the scope of infected systems, and any vulnerabilities in the company’s systems that were exploited. Conducting such an initial analysis will be immensely helpful during subsequent stages of responding to the ransomware. It is important to conduct this exercise in a forensically sound manner that does not alter or obscure evidence of the attacker’s actions.

-Determine whether the ransomed data, or any parts thereof, exist, and make sure they are properly secured. Assess whether the ransomed, encrypted data exists on unaffected devices, with backup systems, or unaffected servers.

-Consider what type of data and how much may have been affected or compromised. Knowing whether sensitive information, such as health or financial records, are impacted and how many customers’ records may be at issue is important. This information will inform the size of the team that needs to be mobilized in response, as well as the type of response, including breach notification, that may need to be taken.

-Take steps to prevent continued access by the attacker. It is important to limit the attacker’s ability to take advantage of any vulnerability and to segregate unaffected systems and data.

-Report internally to the designated individuals to coordinate response. In appropriate cases, it may make sense to apprise senior business leaders, including the Board, who may need to make decisions about how to proceed.

-Keep contemporaneous records. In consultation with legal counsel, it may make sense to record relevant information about the ransomware attack and your response to it, including logging when the attack was first detected, what steps were taken in response, who was notified, and other important information. To the extent possible, this information should be obtained and recorded in a way that does not delete or modify relevant files.

Contact American LegalNet today – The #1 Provider of Litigation Workflow Solutions.

 

Formerly the Department of Homeland Security’s highest-ranking attorney focused on cybersecurity and technology, Washington, DC-based Raj draws on his extensive government and corporate experience to counsel clients on their most critical cybersecurity and privacy issues.

Jensen, who resides in the firm’s San Francisco office, is a highly strategic and skilled litigator specializing in complex civil disputes, regulatory matters, internal investigations, antitrust litigation, data security and privacy matters, and intellectual property disputes.

Read entire article written bKiran Raj and Mallory Jensen in Corporate Counsel here.

 

Supreme Court to Adopt Electronic Filing

Supreme Court to Adopt Electronic Filing

Supreme Court takes a technological step forward Supreme Court will now accept electronic filing.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Surely but slowly, the Supreme Court is entering the 21st century. The court will adopt electronic filing and make new legal filings available online starting Monday Nov 13th, 2017, years behind the rest of the federal court system.

Can livestreamed audio of arguments and even televised sessions be far behind? Yes they can.

But advocates of court openness will take what they can get for now, especially because the Supreme Court will not charge for electronic filing documents. The federal courts’ PACER system does charge fees.

“Though the Supreme Court has moved glacially to join the rest of the judiciary in permitting online filing, that’s better than not at all, and the institution should be commended for creating an e-filing system that, unlike PACER, will be free and easily accessible to the public,” said Gabe Roth, executive director of Fix the Court.

Over the years, the justices have at times shown a glancing familiarity with technology. Some carry computer tablets with high court briefs loaded on them. But notes between justices are routinely sent on paper, definitely not by email. The practice of electronic filing is a new one to this court.

Chief Justice John Roberts himself noted a few years back that the court stuck with pneumatic tubes to transmit newly released opinions from the courtroom to reporters waiting one floor below until 1971, long after their heyday.

Roberts said that it’s appropriate for courts “to be late to the harvest of American ingenuity” because their primary role is to resolve disputes fairly.

 

The Leading Provider of electronic filing

 

Many Supreme Court legal briefs already are available online and for free from several sources. Scotusblog.com obtains and posts many of them, along with opinions. The Justice Department has an easily accessible archive of its extensive high court filings on its website, and the American Bar Association posts briefs in the 70 to 80 cases the court agrees to hear each term.

But the public may not know to look elsewhere. When the justices issued their highly anticipated decision upholding President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul in 2012, the court’s website was overwhelmed.

It, too, has recently been overhauled to make it friendlier to the public.

The Supreme Court’s update to electronic filing comes amid criticism of the PACER system as outmoded and unfair. “The PACER system used by the lower federal courts is hopelessly outdated and cumbersome. And, to add insult to injury, the PACER system charges people fees to access court records that should be made freely available,” said Deepak Gupta, the lead attorney in a class-action lawsuit challenging PACER fees.

The judiciary says the fees provide the only money to pay for the system.

The cost to users was just one among several reasons the court opted not to join the PACER system, court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg said.

“The court elected to design its system in-house so that it would have the capability to customize and continuously update to meet the distinctive needs of the court and counsel,” Arberg said.

Until now, lawyers have not been required to submit electronic filing documents to the court. Beginning Monday, those documents should appear quickly on the court’s website. People who can’t afford to pay court costs will be allowed to file paper copies, which Supreme Court employees will scan and post online.

ALN provides a suite of risk management workflow products for docketing, calendaring and offers an electronic filing platform
Contact American LegalNet – The #1 Provider of Litigation Workflow Solutions.

Not everything is changing. Lawyers still will be required to submit up to 40 paper copies of every brief, and the court’s color-coding system to distinguish types of briefs also will remain.

There’s no timetable for electronic filing to supplant paper as the official court record.

And there’s also no expectation that the justices will drop their prohibition on cameras in the courtroom anytime soon.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who once sounded open to cameras, recently told a New York audience that cameras might detract from the robust exchanges during arguments.

The Supreme Court also refuses to livestream audio of its arguments, even as the federal appeals court just down Capitol Hill recently has allowed live audio access to its hearings. The high court posts transcripts within hours of arguments, but doesn’t release the audio for days.

By MARK SHERMAN of AP News

Nov. 10, 2017

To read original article click here.

November 2017 Court Rules Update

New Court Rule Sets Available:

USDC, California, Central District, Mag. Shashi H. Kewalramani (CASHK)

USDC, New York, Eastern District, Mag. Sanket J. Bulsara (NYSJB)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern Dsitrict (MOCAED)

New York Supreme Court, New York County, Commercial Division, Hon. Andrea Masley (NYNYAM)

 

Courts Removed:

USDC, Central District of California, Hon. Beverly Reid O’Connell (CABRO)

 

Detailed information regarding updated rules can be found on the Rule Update Details page.

EFSP – Electronic Filing Service Provider – How to Find One that is Right for you

Electric filing (“eFiling”) is mandatory in Orange County Courts in California.

In order to file these sensitive documents electronically, it requires all who have cases in the Orange County courts to use a certified electronic filing service provider (EFSP).

What is an EFSP?

You may have seen the acronym “EFSP” and wondered what it means. You may also know that an EFSP is an Electronic Filing Service Provider. Either way let’s examine in more detail the aspects of who or what an EFSP is and how to find the best one for your law firm.

Definition: An Electronic Filing Service Provider (EFSP) is a platform, such as American LegalNet, where one can digitally submit documents for court approvals, thru a secure internet connection

What type of services does an EFSP provide?

There are many eFiling service providers that do not offer many electronic services and only provide eService in several counties. What this means is, you will need a separate provider whenever a courtesy copy needs to be sent, one needs to serve process at the beginning of case, or you need to file in a county that continues to require physical filing. This can make the process tedious, counter productive and confusing.

You will find that the only certified eFiling service provider that offers a complete, statewide set of legal support tools and top notch customer service is American LegalNet. In addition to eFiling with American LegalNet, you are able to add additional physical services using our workflow as you file as well as our comprehensive eDockets system, the first and only platform to offer centralize national rules based docketed integrated with official court forms.

<<< Contact American LegalNet for a free demo! >>>

Electronic Filing Service Provider

Do they have in-depth experience of filing in California?

There’s a network of local rules that documents need to satisfy when filing in California’s superior courts. To ensure that your filings are accepted, law firms need an eFiling service provider that understands the unique differences in each of California’s courts, unlike the many new EFSPs that offer only one kind of solution.

With more than 20 years of experience at American LegalNet, we fully comprehend how to handle delicate court filings. Our devoted team is in steady communication with the courts, and you can be certain that we will know exactly what it is you need to do in order to have a successful filing. Not to mention, we also serve more than half of the ALM 100.

Does an electronic filing service provider offer outstanding customer support?

American LegalNet has been in business for over 20 years serving the Southern California legal community. This sort of expertise not only means that we understand how valuable these documents are, but what it takes to increase the rate at which you file.

Our clients are of the utmost importance to us. So, we have established the best support system and customer satisfaction platform you’ll find to be more comprehensive that any other provider on the market.

Have questions on American LegalNet or how to eFile? Contact us today at (818) 817-9225 or on our contact page here. 

Risk Management Survey Finds Law Firms Have Concerns about Risk, Security and Lawsuits and Inadequate Technology to Address Them

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

American LegalNet 2017 Risk Management Survey Finds Law Firms Have Concerns about Risk, Security and Lawsuits and Inadequate Technology to Address Them

Los Angeles, CA– October 4, 2017 – Today American LegalNet, Inc. (ALN) announced the results of its third annual Risk Management Survey, conducted during ILTACON 2017 in August. Register to receive the complete survey results here.

Overview of Findings
The 2017 Survey aimed to determine what law firms considered their greatest risk exposures, and to gauge their confidence and available resources to address these concerns.
In summary, the Survey results showed:
– growing uncertainty regarding who had overall responsibility for risk management
– expansion in risk management worries to include threats like malware/ransomware
– agreement that malpractice lawsuit risk was rising
– evidence of outdated or decentralized calendaring and docketing systems
– surprisingly slow adoption of cloud-based calendaring/docketing systems
– despite challenges, respondents felt capable of addressing these risks
– more than half planned to invest more in risk management in the coming year

Highlights of the 2017 American LegalNet Risk Management Survey Results:

  • Nearly One-third of Respondents Don’t Know Who’s Responsible for Risk Management – At 28.73%, “Don’t know” was the most popular answer to the question “Who bears overall responsibility for your firm’s risk management function?” even though two new answer choices were added this year: Governance Committee and IT Director. There was a definite drop in General Counsel’s responsibility from last year– the 2016 figure was 38.16% and 2017’s figure was less than half that at 18.78%.
  • Top Risk Management Challenges Include Malware/Ransomware & Human Error – While in 2016, 55.88% of 2016 respondents had ranked Cyber Threats as their #1 biggest risk management challenge, in 2017 Cyber Threats was joined by Negligence/Human Error and new entrant Malware, Ransomware and Viruses, the latter not surprising, given the devastating impact of WannaCry and other recent attacks. Cyber Threats scored 28.32% on the 2017 top risks list with Malware and Negligence both scoring 21.97% each.
  • Risk of Malpractice Suits on the Rise – 48.84% of 2017 survey respondents answered “Agree” that the risk of legal malpractice suits had increased in recent years, only 6.98% disagreed, and the remaining 44.19% said they weren’t sure. 2016 “Agree” responses were already strong in 2016 but the number increased 9.13% in 2017.
  • Negligence and Human Error Most Likely Causes for Malpractice Claims – 2017 respondents said the most likely underlying causes of malpractice claims were “Negligence/Human Error” with 36.42% and “I don’t know” with 34.68%. The “I don’t know” answer was added to the survey this year; since one-third of respondents chose it, it’s clear there is a substantial lack of awareness about malpractice claim risk exposures.
  • Outdated Docketing Technology Creates Significant Risk – 59.54% of 2017 respondents answered “Agree” that a decentralized or outdated docketing system created significant risk for their firms. Only 9.25% disagreed, and 31.21% were not sure. Compared with 2016 survey numbers, the 2017 “Agree” numbers increased by 3.66%, the “Disagree” number decreased by 3.99%, and the “Not sure” number was about the same.
  • Slow Adoption of Cloud-based Docketing/Calendaring Tools
    Only a total of 10.43% responded to the two “Yes” options about having a cloud-based docketing/calendaring solution. A very large majority of 72.39% said “No” and 17.18% said “Don’t know”. Even though cloud-based technologies have gained credibility and popularity in many areas, the survey results show that adoption of cloud-based docketing and calendaring is slow and minimal in law firms so far.
  • Confidence in Capability to Address and Mitigate Risk – this year’s respondents were confident in their ability to address and mitigate risk. A large contingent, 76.69%, responded they were capable, more than capable or extremely capable. 20.25% said “We have work to do” and only 3.07 said “Minimal.”
  • More Plans to Increase Investment in Risk Management this Year – More than half of 2017 respondents (57.67%) said they would be making additional budget available for risk management initiatives in the next 12 months, an 11% increase over the 2016 response to this question.

About the 2017 Survey Respondents
The 2017 Survey respondent pool was more than double that of the 2016 survey, and was comprised of a diverse group of legal IT, general counsel, risk & compliance, and practice support professionals. The 2017 survey had 43.55% IT department respondents and more than half specializing in other areas like legal, risk/compliance and practice support. The 2016 survey responders were primarily IT professionals (71.8%).

The largest 2017 survey majorities responded from the biggest firms with 500+ attorneys (24.54%) and from firms with 101-250 attorneys (20.25%). 2017 marked a 6.21% increase over 2016 in responses from 500+ attorney firms.

According to Erez Bustan, CEO and Founder of American LegalNet: “The 2017 Risk Management Survey produced intriguing results. Taking this new data into account, American LegalNet will continue to focus on identifying and solving risk management problems for law firms from a technology standpoint.”

For more information or to receive the survey results, visit: http://www.alncorp.com/2017-risk-management-survey-results/.

About American LegalNet, Inc.

American LegalNet (ALN) was founded in 1996 and is a trusted partner to law firms, empowering them with innovative workflow management technologies that help mitigate risks, increase operational efficiencies, and reduce costs so they can focus on their core competencies. Today American LegalNet is the premier provider of Desktop to Courthouse workflow solutions that include eDockets, Docket Direct, Forms WorkFlow, Smart Dockets and Docket Alerts. American LegalNet is based in Los Angeles. For more information, visit http://www.alncorp.com or email sales@alncorp.com. Follow us on Twitter @ALN3, and on LinkedIn and Facebook.

###

Contact:      Christy Burke
Burke & Company LLC
917-623-5096
cburke@burke-company.com

October 2017 Court Rules Update

New Court Rule Sets Available:

  • Criminal Rules, USDC, Central District of California, Hon. Dale S. Fischer (DSFCR)
  • Mississippi Supreme Court (MSSC)
  • Mississippi Court of Appeals (MSCOA)

Court Rule Sets Removed:

  • USDC, Northern District of Illinois, Hon. Milton I. Shadur (ILMIS)

Detailed information regarding updated rules can be found on the Rule Update Details page.

5th ANNUAL NDA CONFERENCE Recap – Thank You National Docketing Association!!

After a fantastic conference we would like to extend a note of gratitude to the National Docketing Association.

The National Docketing Association’s vision is to unite docketing professionals, invite the exchange of ideas, increase awareness, and establish professional connections. That vision came to fruition and was a huge success once again in 2017.

The NDA Conference featured two full days of educational sessions and other learning opportunities, presentations by industry experts, networking prospects, and the chance to learn about the latest in docketing and legal management products, services and technology from well-known and trusted business partners like American LegalNet.

Our VP of Sales Dan O’Day gave an incredible panel on the trends of Legal Technology and how “Docketing is a profession” Some key points he made:

  1. eFiling – the digital era is here
  2. Standardization of Practices
  3. Decreasing variable costs to the client
  4. Integration of all Systems
  5. Making everything Mobile friendly

Watch Dan O’Day’s panel from the National Docketing Association Conference here:

However – how could we be in Orlando, FL and not enjoy the beautiful weather? Here are some pictures from our first couple of American LegalNet event days by the poolside! We love the opportunity to make new friends while catching up with the clients we have had that makes our company so great.

Then we had a great evening at end of the opening reception at Benihana!

American LegalNet was honored to receive an award from the National Docketing Association for being sponsors. What an incredible organization!

Here is a clip of National Docketing Association’s keynote from Marion Baker. Some great tips about creating policies in law firms that do not allow last day filing to provide more time to deal with corrections, avoiding the risk of missing deadlines. Watch the clip here:

After long days of docketing talks – here are some great pictures from Tapa Toro!

Thank you so much to the National Docketing Association for having American LegalNet work with the best in the industry.

We will see you next year!

5th ANNUAL NDA CONFERENCE hosted by the National Docketing Association

Are you attending the 5th Annual NDA Conference in Orlando Sept 17-19? If so, here is what to expect!

The National Docketing Association’s vision is to unite docketing professionals, invite the exchange of ideas, increase awareness, and establish professional connections.

Who will be there? We most certainly will be! Not only will you have the opportunity to meet some of our amazing staff, and President of ALN, Erez Bustan, but American LegalNet will be revealing some of our exciting new products and capabilities at the show. Make sure you drop by the American LegalNet table at the conference to learn more and sign up for a free demo!

NDA 2017 at the Hyatt Regency Grand Cypress

The NDA Conference will feature two full days of educational sessions and other learning opportunities, presentations by industry experts, networking prospects, and the chance to learn about the latest in docketing and legal management products, services and technology from well-known and trusted business partners. The 2017 NDA Fifth Annual Conference is the premier event for any docketing related professional and administrator and this year, it is being held September 17 through 19, 2017 in Orlando, FL at the Hyatt Regency Grand Cypress.

UPDATE: The NDA Conference Agenda was updated as of 9/17/2017.

See below for the NDA Conference Agenda!

 

 

 

 

September 2017 Court Rules Update

New Court Rule Sets Available:

  • USDC, Eastern District of Texas, Hon. Robert W. Schroeder, III (TXRWS)
  • Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 9th Judicial District, Cumberland County (PA09)
  • Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 29th Judicial District, Lycoming County (PA29)

Court Rule Sets Removed:

  • USDC, Central District of California, Mag. David T. Bristow (DTB)
  • NY Supreme Court, New York County, Commercial Division, Hon. Jeffrey K. Oing (NYNYJO)
  • NY Supreme Court, New York County, Commercial Division, Hon. Anil C. Singh (NYCDAS)

Detailed information regarding updated rules can be found on the Rule Update Details page.

Bitnami